Okay, I promise I am not going to blog about every PTAB opinion mentioning the 2019 Guidance, but this one has to be seen to be believed. Subscribers can find the file history and opinion here. Nonsubscribers can find it here. For the discussion, I will turn it over to Mr. IPLaw, who beat me to this one: https://www.mriplaw.com/blog/d94zitkc92bgqcrux9ho66oyczb9ew
The examiner had fared pretty well at the PTAB over the past 3 years. S/he is probably more stunned than me.
BTW, I agree 100% that these claims are patent eligible. Are they patentable? I don’t know. Haven’t looked at the art.
US 5,982,370 ?